| Introduction A
ballot initiative that will soon be facing Colorado voters would amend the state
constitution by denying all "non-emergency" government services, other
than those mandated by federal law, to illegal, or unauthorized, immigrants. This
initiative, sponsored by a group with the polarizing name "Defend Colorado
Now," has the backing of former Governor Dick Lamm and Congressman Tom Tancredo,
both of whom have long been identified with extreme anti-immigrant positions. Any
thoughtful consideration of this initiative must begin from the undeniable fact
that the initiative's passage into law would accomplish next to nothing. Will
the initiative's provisions bar illegal immigrants from receiving food stamps
or welfare benefits? No; they are not receiving these benefits at present. Will
the initiative prevent illegal immigrants from receiving emergency medical care,
police protection, or education in the public schools? Once again, the answer
is no, because these services are required by federal law. The official website
for "Defend Colorado Now" does not provide even the roughest of estimates
as to how much the state's taxpayers would save if the initiative were passed.
The measure's proponents, when pressed by reporters from the editorially conservative
Rocky Mountain News, were "unable to say what services illegal immigrants
are now receiving that would stop if the initiative passed in November" (Rocky
Mountain News, 5 January 2006, 18A). Most
Coloradans readily recognize that the current immigration system is not working
adequately. The number of illegal immigrants in our state has increased significantly
over the past decade and this increase cannot continue indefinitely without causing
serious social problems. The current unsettled situation along the U.S. border
with Mexico raises valid national security concerns, and creates grave humanitarian
problems for those seeking to cross the border. But the anti-immigrant initiative
being proposed in our state does not move us forward in addressing these important
concerns. Instead, passage of the initiative would be far likelier to stir up
racial and ethnic divisions than provide any answers to the complex problem of
illegal immigration. An
informed debate about the presence of a significant number of illegal immigrants
in our state will only begin once the voters have considered this issue in all
of its dimensions, and not simply in its economic repercussions, as the proponents
of the current initiative have mistakenly done. As we are not talking about commodities,
such as oil or grain, but about our fellow human beings, the debate about illegal
immigration does not only involve economic considerations: it includes social
justice, legal and political, and spiritual and religious aspects, as well. Let
us now consider these wider dimensions of the debate, beginning with the economic
factors. Download
the complete PDF
|